Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Ultimate NewswireUltimate Newswire

U.S. News

Arizona Supreme Court Affirms 1864 Legislation Restricting Virtually All Abortions

via BBC News

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that a 1864 law banning all abortions except those to save the mother’s life takes precedence over a 2022 law limiting abortions to 15 weeks of pregnancy.

While not ruling on the constitutionality of the 1864 ban, the court found it was still enforceable given the lack of federal abortion protections and that the newer law did not explicitly override it.

“We consider whether the Arizona Legislature repealed or otherwise restricted [the old law] by enacting…the statute proscribing physicians from performing elective abortions after fifteen weeks’ gestation,” Justice John Lopez wrote. “This case involves statutory interpretation—it does not rest on the justices’ morals or public policy views regarding abortion; nor does it rest on [the old law’s] constitutionality, which is not before us.”

The decision affirms a lower court injunction but stays full enforcement for 14 days to allow parties to pursue further action.

It also remands any remaining constitutional challenges to the trial court.

“Absent the federal constitutional abortion right, and because [the fifteen-week limit] does not independently authorize abortion, there is no provision in federal or state law prohibiting [the 1864 law’s] operation. Accordingly, [the 1864 law] is now enforceable,” Lopez wrote.

The ruling comes as abortion rights activists work to put a constitutional amendment protecting abortion on Arizona’s November ballot in response to the state’s near-total ban going into effect.

“The abortion issue implicates morality and public policy concerns, and invariably inspires spirited debate and engenders passionate disagreements among citizens,” Lopez added. “A policy matter of this gravity must ultimately be resolved by our citizens through the legislature or the initiative process. Today, we decline to make this weighty policy decision because such judgments are reserved for our citizens. Instead, we merely follow our limited constitutional role and duty to interpret the law as written.”

You May Also Like

Entertainment

Comedian Jerry Seinfeld believes the movie business is overdue to being replaced as the dominant form of cultural entertainment and storytelling. In an interview...

U.S. News

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has agreed to testify publicly in June before the...

Media

David Beckham has sued Mark Wahlberg and F45 Training for $10 million over a failed business deal involving the fitness franchise. Beckham claims he...

Politics

Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie criticized President Biden for not reaching out to him after Christie said he would not endorse Donald Trump...

Entertainment

A Texas high school senior lost her status as valedictorian just weeks before graduation due to a miscalculation of her GPA. Maya Veliz had...

U.S. News

Michael Avenatti, the former attorney for Stormy Daniels, says he has communicated with Donald Trump’s legal team and offered to testify on Trump’s behalf...

Politics

President Biden has vowed to let key provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire in 2025 if re-elected, which would result...

Most Recent

Uncategorized

Democratic Minnesota state senator Nicole Mitchell has been removed from her committee assignments and barred from caucus meetings after being arrested last week for...

U.S. News

A recent poll found that 51% of Americans support mass deportation of illegal immigrants, a policy promised by Trump. Support varied by party, with...

Politics

Rep. Paul Gosar warned that President Biden using legal action against Trump has taken the US to a dangerous place and could erode citizens’...

Media

A Jewish student at Columbia University filed a class action lawsuit against the school, alleging it failed to provide a safe environment amid rising...

Advertisement